[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
Thomas Bushnell, BSG scripsit:
> I think the whole concept is an insane departure from the guiding
> principle of Scheme standardization, which is to provide a small set
> of extremely powerful features.
That's why there's WG1 and WG2.
> Perhaps the WG2 thing language should be called "CL-Scheme"
We do need a name for the WG2 language, and Common Scheme actually
isn't bad. Then we can call the WG1 language Diamond Scheme.
> and have a loop macro. :)
It definitely will, probably either Taylor Campbell's or Olin Shivers's.
No :-) at all.
You annoy me, Rattray! You disgust me! John Cowan
You irritate me unspeakably! Thank Heaven, cowan@x
I am a man of equable temper, or I should http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
scarcely be able to contain myself before
your mocking visage. --Stalky imitating Macrea
Scheme-reports mailing list