[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"

On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Andre van Tonder <andre@x> wrote:
> But if WG1-voted decisions are written in stone as you say, then it makes
> little sense for this discussion group to even continue.  What was the point
> then of making the draft public?  I will henceforth stop my
> "moaning"/participation here.  I wish you good luck.

Relax, our decisions are not set in stone, and all
input is appreciated.  You and others have made
some excellent points.  We just don't want to go
back and forth endlessly on minor issues that
we've already made a decision on for which no
new arguments have been made.


Scheme-reports mailing list