Dont miss the line on the next page.On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x> wrote:
That to me means the effect of the with-exception-handler
is to raise an exception handled by some top-level handler.
However, the example says the _expression_ evaluates to <unspecified>
- i.e. it should actually return.Yes, that's what will happen - I'll fix that."After printing, the second example then raises another ex-ception."My understanding is that it will not return.
Has this changed in any way in R7RS from how R6RS and SRFI-34 works?
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports