[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS

To: scheme-reports-wg1@x
Subject: Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 13:54:05 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-virus-scanned:x-hashcash:message-id:date :from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=whVSj1ayGlEAbNpwt/92lXTnbsmeTQyE3PIx7AMaIqa9SgHma55MZdd47nqIGfCT4L A67SHq+WeTfEkP1tWUIEQQaaoQ9vyOqh1/uTE4yUij2grBqPtMaKudeM+pm4AVNYnUPH eouanMb98Uw9hxHDfLc5DdlZIBS5wiBmt+38w=
In-reply-to: <AANLkTinyqT33eFLO2gMxjK74Ar9xvFrGuK5eOM1a3sxc@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1292188488.3696.27.camel@io> <20101213000944.GA32438@mercury.ccil.org> <4D06BE58.7020708@bothner.com> <1292318090.2412.31.camel@io> <4D07A7E9.2070601@bothner.com> <20101214173925.GD4465@mercury.ccil.org> <4D07BFB5.2060905@bothner.com> <AANLkTinyqT33eFLO2gMxjK74Ar9xvFrGuK5eOM1a3sxc@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/21/11 09:25, David Rush wrote:

> Are we really willing to go here? I'd be up for it, but I thought that
> the community was shying away from radical changes through
> standardization, and that deep innovation in the Scheme community was
> supposed to be led by implementations.

I agree... pattern matching would be lovely, but we'd be on shaky ground
shoving it in now! Too much danger of implementations shaking their head
at such a change, and skipping R7RS as many have skipped R6RS.

> david

ABS

--
Alaric Snell-Pym
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/

References:
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  - From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  - From: Per Bothner <per@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  - From: Per Bothner <per@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  - From: David Rush <kumoyuki@x>

Prev by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Next by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Previous by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Next by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread