[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
25 minutes ago, Alex Shinn wrote:
> The point is that the popular macro systems outside the syntax-case
> family all do not and _cannot_ support raw single-arity macro
> transformers. They are fundamentally incompatible. The only known
> solution is to use wrappers, which is why syntax-rules and the ER
> and SC family all use wrappers.
Right, see my earlier post.
> If you want to insist on exposing the transformer signature, then
> you're arguing that none of the other macro systems are worth
Wrong, same post.
> and no future innovation is worth investigating.
Even more wrong. (Same post, still.)
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
Scheme-reports mailing list