Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers

[Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>]

On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x> wrote:

But what happens if you try to REVERSE a syntax-object wrapping a list?
You can't - 

Overall your essay is illuminating, but reversing a syntax-object representing a list is easy in an R6RS-conforming implementation.

(define (reverse-wrapped-list obj)

  (syntax-case obj ()

    ((e ...) (reverse #'(e ...)))))

...though maybe your whole point was that there should be more basic tools available (standardized) for de-structuring instead of the heavy-handed syntax-case?

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports