[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses

To: Alan Watson <alan@x>
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 07:04:24 +0000
Cc: scheme-reports@x
In-reply-to: <C2F47B78-EDC6-4907-87B0-AF1E15DC02E1@alan-watson.org>
References: <66930DBA-011D-4AFE-8AAF-D1E038C1819F@alan-watson.org> <CAOLEvS0d7yENrxo0KWmScL+PAZxDpeHiFFZeW+p_GRiOKbxc6w@mail.gmail.com> <9524F4FD-288A-4906-89F8-1D16B29A5B59@alan-watson.org> <CAOLEvS0saDWsL88JMuVVAzGqmpHaLtwnnLqUWjgHYRRuoeZ_Uw@mail.gmail.com> <C2F47B78-EDC6-4907-87B0-AF1E15DC02E1@alan-watson.org>

I have re-read SRFI 39 now.

I was under the impression it was binding identifiers to parameters,
but instead (as you said) it evaluates the expression to receive a
parameter object.

Sorry for my 'useless' input :)

Cheers

leppie


-- 
http://codeplex.com/IronScheme
http://xacc.wordpress.com

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  - From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>

References:
- [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  - From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  - From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  - From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  - From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  - From: Alan Watson <alan@x>

Prev by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
Next by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
Previous by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
Next by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread