Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Mark H Weaver scripsit:

> It is a shame that the R4RS and R5RS stopped explaining the concept
> behind 'eqv?' that was so clearly explained in the RRRS and R3RS.  The
> result is that the current generation of Scheme hackers have apparently
> forgotten what 'eqv?' is for.

The WG has not forgotten; we looked at this precise point.

-- 
John Cowan    http://ccil.org/~cowan  cowan@x
Arise, you prisoners of Windows / Arise, you slaves of Redmond, Wash,
The day and hour soon are coming / When all the IT folks say "Gosh!"
It isn't from a clever lawsuit / That Windowsland will finally fall,
But thousands writing open source code / Like mice who nibble through a wall.
        --The Linux-nationale by Greg Baker

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports