Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs

[Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>]

Hallo,

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Andre van Tonder <andre@x> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011, Alex Queiroz wrote:
>
>>    True, but I think that more descriptive names are more
>> Scheme-ish. I would expect to see BYTEVECTOR in a Scheme report, but
>> not BLOB.
>
> What about CONS, CAR, or CDR?
>

     Historical reasons? Does anyone think they are good names? (ok,
they compose well, but...)

-- 
-alex
http://www.artisancoder.com/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports