[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Andre van Tonder <andre@x> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011, Alex Queiroz wrote:
>> True, but I think that more descriptive names are more
>> Scheme-ish. I would expect to see BYTEVECTOR in a Scheme report, but
>> not BLOB.
> What about CONS, CAR, or CDR?
Historical reasons? Does anyone think they are good names? (ok,
they compose well, but...)
Scheme-reports mailing list