[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> Sure, you can change your mind about what you think is good for WG2,
> but you can't retroactively change the vote. Pending a proper WG2
> vote, the WG1 members must act under the assumption that WG2 will have
> R6RS-style blobs only.
Actually it's the other way around: what WG2 voted for was "homogenous
numeric arrays", without specifying how they would be implemented.
See http://tinyurl.com/wg2-ballot . BlobAPI is a proposal that would
handle both that and R6RS-style bytevector accessors and mutators using
the same machinery.
A few times, I did some exuberant stomping about, John Cowan
like a hippo auditioning for Riverdance, though cowan@x
I stopped when I thought I heard something at http://ccil.org/~cowan
the far side of the room falling over in rhythm
with my feet. --Joseph Zitt
Scheme-reports mailing list