[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
On 2011-01-22, at 16:48, Andre van Tonder wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2011, John Cowan wrote:
>> Andre van Tonder scripsit:
>>> You don't really gain much since you would still need to say something like
>>> (import (except (rnrs) + - * - /)
>> Yes, that's what I mean by a single point of messiness. But the alternative
>> is to use prefixed names at *every* point of call, without even the option
>> of changing or shortening the prefix. IMHO that is a worse mess.
> Technically, you can change or shorten it as follows:
> (import (rename (flonum-operations) (fx+ +) (fx- -) (fx* *) .......))
If I have syntax-case or some other macro system, I can write a macro
(/ (+ (- b) (sqrt discriminant)) (* 2.0 a)))
that does the renaming inside the form. I would argue that this is clearer, and allows flonum arithmetic to coexist in the same piece of code with fixnum or generic arithmetic. It definitely beats renaming.
Scheme-reports mailing list