Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module

["Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>]

On Tue, 24 May 2011 13:04:21 -0400, Emmanuel Medernach  
<emmanuel.medernach@x> wrote:

> Indeed, but in (foo X Y) I would not allow the evaluation of expression  
> X to interfere with Y : if X is (values X1 X2) and Y is (values), foo  
> could mislead X1 with X and X2 with Y as in some implementation. I mean  
> doesn't the report has to specify that evaluation of X has to be bound  
> to X only ?

Indeed, how many implementation contain this semantics? Is it a semantics  
that is justified or should we clarify the language to not permit values  
passed to one continuation to "infect" another continuation? I'm of a mind  
that this sort of requirement would be a good thing.

	Aaron W. Hsu

-- 
Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports