Re: [Scheme-reports] initial results of implementor intentions poll

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> The following were less committal, but open, and their
> implementations are flexible enough to implement R7RS in
> third-party code:

I should think that the R6RS-only implementations would be able to
implement most of R7RS-small using a common library, with just a
little bit of code to accept define-library as equivalent to module.
Writing such a common library would be a Worthy Thing.

-- 
Deshil Holles eamus.  Deshil Holles eamus.  Deshil Holles eamus.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit. (3x)
Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!  Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!  Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!
  --Joyce, Ulysses, "Oxen of the Sun"       cowan@x

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports