Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> No, it makes me profoundly unhappy, but at least it's
> a viable solution.
> 
> I think providing `current-tai-seconds' is all around a much
> simpler solution.  

Implementations that have Posix time but no corrections will have to
return #f from current-tai-seconds at all times, making it useless.
Current-posix-seconds is available in all non-embedded systems in
modern use.

-- 
What has four pairs of pants, lives             John Cowan
in Philadelphia, and it never rains             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
but it pours?                                   cowan@x
        --Rufus T. Firefly

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports