[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
- To: scheme-reports@x
- Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
- From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:48:56 -0400
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTik2QF-u=58SLtQDTTWnx6htQxhqXA@mail.gmail.com>
- Organization: Indiana University
- References: <BANLkTi=hSfKrHo13BUMP==SNPCX-+As0HQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=kSqWZpF-fAPObreiuAf9FxPb85w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTik2QF-u=58SLtQDTTWnx6htQxhqXA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:35:53 -0400, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x> wrote:
> As you say, there is no "=>" bound in (scheme base).
> So long as it's not bound in the usage context it will
> thus work with `cond'.
I forget, has the ramifications of this to the REPL semantics been
discussed? Some Schemes specifically treat all identifiers as implicitly
bound at the top-level in the REPL, which makes implicit auxiliary
keywords fail at the REPL, though they still work inside of libraries.
Aaron W. Hsu
--
Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking.
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports