[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate

William D Clinger scripsit:

> With regard to the R5RS semantics, John has explained his reasoning.
> -From- John's explanation, I know he jumped to a false conclusion
> via an invalid generalization based on his incorrect guess about the
> purpose of two examples.  I will post on this at length when I have
> time this evening (and access to my archives).

I look forward to this with bait on my breath.

If I read "upcoming" in [the newspaper]              John Cowan
once more, I will be downcoming                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and somebody will be outgoing.                       cowan@x

Scheme-reports mailing list