Re: [Scheme-reports] Hardcoded identifier names in formal syntax

[Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>]

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x> wrote:
>
> I'd like to re-raise a point which I mentioned before, but which I think
> got lost in the noise:
> http://lists.scheme-reports.org/pipermail/scheme-reports/2011-April/000390.html
>
> In R7RS's formal syntax (chapter 7) there are many productions (mainly
> under <derived-expression>) which include hardcoded "constant names" like
> COND, DEFINE, CASE-LAMBDA etc.  I don't understand why this is neccessary
> or even desirable.

Hi Peter, thanks for checking up on this.

As you say, this was raised before and these have already
been removed in the latest trunk.

-- 
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports