[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax

On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Andy Wingo <wingo@x> wrote:
I see that the report decided that the `_', `else', `...', etc auxiliary
syntaxes are to be bound in (scheme base).  That's probably a good
thing.  Good job.  I guess they'd be bound like:

  (define-syntax else (syntax-rules ())

Does that definition need to go in the report, along with the definition
of `cond' et al?

I don't think so.  Any definition will do - the purpose of the
definitions of derived syntax is to show non-trivial definitions.


Scheme-reports mailing list