[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.2 pairs and lists
- To: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.2 pairs and lists
- From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:26:12 -0400
- Cc: scheme-reports <scheme-reports@x>
- In-reply-to: <m3pqne63jn.fsf@unquote.localdomain>
- References: <m3pqne63jn.fsf@unquote.localdomain>
Andy Wingo scripsit:
> The template for `append' seems to indicate that it could accept 0
> arguments.
>
> Suggestion: clarify to specify that two or more (one or more?) arguments
> are required.
I see nothing wrong with allowing zero arguments. All 21 Schemes support
this, and it makes (apply append list-of-lists) do the Right Thing in the
degenerate cases.
--
John Cowan cowan@x http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"?
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports