Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax

[Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>]

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x> wrote:
>
> While we're on the topic of numerical stuff in the standard, I'd like
> to ask why the "padding"/placeholder digits for numbers (# characters
> instead of digits inside a number) is kept around.

I'd like to hear from someone who knows the history
better, but I believe it's intended more as write syntax
than read - when someone asks for more digits of
precision than are available, the remainder use "#".

-- 
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports