[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"

On 09/08/2011 05:20 AM, leppie wrote:
>  From what I understand, no legal syntax maybe be rejected by the
> compiler. The error must always be raised at runtime.

That is certainly not my understanding.  If there is such a requirement,
I will ignore it, at least in default (non-pedantic) mode.
	--Per Bothner
per@x   http://per.bothner.com/

Scheme-reports mailing list