[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
On 09/08/2011 05:20 AM, leppie wrote:
> From what I understand, no legal syntax maybe be rejected by the
> compiler. The error must always be raised at runtime.
That is certainly not my understanding. If there is such a requirement,
I will ignore it, at least in default (non-pedantic) mode.
--
--Per Bothner
per@x http://per.bothner.com/
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports