[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
Le 2012-11-14 à 5:18 AM, Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x> a écrit :
> On Wed, Nov 14 2012, Alex Shinn wrote:
>> Then why can you say that a REPL "should" support redefinition?
>> (Without defining what redefinition means.)
>> This refers to redefining variables and syntax in general.
>> For the specific case of redefining record types we could
>> add a note that existing instances may or may not be
>> mapped to the new type according to some unspecified
>> semantics, but I'm not sure if such a note adds anything.
> Just figured out that neither include nor load can be used to
> define/redefine libraries. So libraries are immutable and there is no
> portable way to "add" new libraries, right?
I find this design choice unacceptable and a show stopper for me.
Scheme-reports mailing list