Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Andy Wingo scripsit:

> I think that Per is saying that if `set!' returns no values, then
> there is nothing for P to ignore.

Sure.  But "making the REPL nicer" is not an argument in favor of set!
returning no values, as the REPL can be just as nice when set! returns a
(distinguished) value.

-- 
John Cowan                              cowan@x
            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Humpty Dump Dublin squeaks through his norse
                Humpty Dump Dublin hath a horrible vorse
But for all his kinks English / And his irismanx brogues
                Humpty Dump Dublin's grandada of all rogues.  --Cousin James

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports