[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot
> True. However, an implementation based on UTF-16 has no reason to
> forbid #\null in strings. The vote says only that implementations
> MAY forbid #\null in strings, not that they MUST do so. At present,
> no Scheme implementation forbids #\null in strings.
Oops, I somehow read the proposal as if it MUST NOT allow to contain #\null.
Sorry for my misunderstanding.
Scheme-reports mailing list