Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple returns from map functions?

[Andy Wingo <wingo@x>]

On Thu 05 May 2011 19:39, "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x> writes:

> On Thu, 05 May 2011 11:43:53 -0400, <xacc.ide@x> wrote:
>
>> The brings up the question whether list control procedures can accept  
>> cyclic
>> lists.
>
>> Should the following be valid?
>
> This is interesting, normally, `map' is specifically not allowed to take  
> circular lists and you get an error when trying to deal with them.  
> However, that is partly because of the restriction prior to this that all  
> arguments should be of the same length. Now, I think, there is an  
> opportunity to consider `map' in different terms. Whether we should do  
> this or not is still up to question.

I don't know either, but do see srfi-1.

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports