[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> The format has always been that the prototype specifies the basic
> types, and additional domain restrictions immediately follow as the
> first line of the specification. This keeps all domain info together,
> so I'm inclined not to diverge from the traditional format here - if
> anyone wants to swap the order we'd need a vote.
Well, if you insist. This is not a substantive change to Scheme, just
putting the basic purpose of a function before its domain conditions.
But, sigh, ticket #343 filed.
> Of course we should remove redundant domain restrictions already
> implied by the prototype.
That has been done, though some cases may have been overlooked.
Samuel Johnson on playing the violin: John Cowan
"Difficult do you call it, Sir? cowan@x
I wish it were impossible." http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Scheme-reports mailing list