On Sun 06 Jan 2013 07:51, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x> writes:I have two problems with it. One is that very few Schemers have used
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Andy Wingo <wingo@x> wrote:
> `raise-continuable' is poorly understood in the context of Scheme.
> would punt it to WG2 if possible.
> Could you be more specific? What exactly are the problems you see?
it. I asked on this list once who had used it, and no one replied in
the affirmative. Therefore it is not "core" enough to go into a "small"
Secondly, its presence prohibits useful behaviors. For example, it
would be easy to make a `call-with-port' that closes its port on
exceptional exits by installing a throw handler. However, since throw
handlers are also used for raise-continuable, this is not possible.
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports