Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax

[Stefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>]

There is also the grammar as it is laid out in TSPL3:

http://scheme.com/tspl3/grammar.html#./grammar:h0 

Which is similar to what Mr. Robbin's wrote above, save for hoisting the '+' & '-' rules into the complex production above. 

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:00 PM, John Cowan <cowan@x> wrote:

Andrew Robbins scripsit:

> On a more serious note, is there any harm in rewriting
> the current syntax a little more clearly? For example:

I like this proposal.  I have asked a friend of mine who knows how to
use proof engines to see if this grammar is equivalent to the existing
grammar.

--
John Cowan      cowan@x         http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

Statistics don't help a great deal in making important decisions.
Most people have more than the average number of feet, but I'm not about
to start a company selling shoes in threes. --Ross Gardler

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

--
====
Q. How many Prolog programmers does it take to change a lightbulb?
A. No.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports