[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Jussi Piitulainen
> <jpiitula@x> wrote:
>> Do all these need to remain in the language? In (scheme base)?
> We should put them somewhere for compatibility, but
> I definitely think everything but the one and two depth
> combinations should be removed from (scheme base).
> Their use is generally a code smell. People should
> use destructuring, records, or SRFI-1 first..tenth accessors.
Is this a case where common practice among Scheme implementation is
the functions are no longer valued so they are going away?
Scheme-reports mailing list