[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:29 AM, John Cowan <cowan@x> wrote:
> Alex Shinn scripsit:
>> I'll modify the draft to use R6RS semantics, and
>> re-open this for confirmation in the next ballot.
> Let's let this conversation work itself out first, please.
By all means, but the ballot item was unclear and
will require a re-vote. In the meantime, the draft
we submit with the call for formal comments will
need to revert to either R5RS (unspecified) or R6RS.
Scheme-reports mailing list