Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN

[Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>]

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:29 AM, John Cowan <cowan@x> wrote:
> Alex Shinn scripsit:
>
>> I'll modify the draft to use R6RS semantics, and
>> re-open this for confirmation in the next ballot.
>
> Let's let this conversation work itself out first, please.

By all means, but the ballot item was unclear and
will require a re-vote.  In the meantime, the draft
we submit with the call for formal comments will
need to revert to either R5RS (unspecified) or R6RS.

-- 
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports