[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
- To: scheme-reports@x
- Subject: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
- From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 03:15:42 -1000
This is a somewhat old issue, but I wonder how '|' symbol-escapes ended up
excluding '|' and '\' inside it. Does it intend a room for future
extension that
vertical bar and backslashes can be included in '|' symbol escapes by escaping
them with '\', as in CL? I searched tickets in the WG1 trac site but couldn't
find the discussions on it except ticket #16.
It's not that I'm opposing to the current syntax. To include vertical bar
or backslash, I can still use \x7c; and \x5c; without '|'-escapes.
I'm just curious
about the rationale of the decision out of various options, notably:
- Excluding '|' within |-escapes are understandable, but why '\' is excluded,
especially if we don't allow to any extra escaping insinde '|'s?
- CL also has '|'-escapes but they don't delimit symbols, so |abc|def|ghi| is
read as a single symbol abcDEFghi. R7RS doesn't explicitly say '|' delimits
the symbol, but also doesn't seem to allow |abc|def syntax according
to 7.1.1. I'm fine with either way, but was it a conscious decision?
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports