Re: [Scheme-reports] inexact->exact and vice versa

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Vincent Manis scripsit:

> I was trying to puzzle out the exact required behavior of
> INEXACT->EXACT and EXACT->INEXACT just now. I found the description
> in the Draft (essentially the same as R5RS) maddeningly vague, and
> therefore, after reviewing the R6RS descriptions of EXACT and INEXACT,
> I came up with the following.

I've adopted your wording.

> By the way, when the next draft is prepared, would it be possible to
> add the hyperref package? I do so like hyperlinks.

Maybe, but someone else will have to do it; I am no TeXpert.

-- 
John Cowan  cowan@x   http://ccil.org/~cowan
Promises become binding when there is a meeting of the minds and consideration
is exchanged. So it was at King's Bench in common law England; so it was
under the common law in the American colonies; so it was through more than
two centuries of jurisprudence in this country; and so it is today.
       --Specht v. Netscape

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports