Hello,On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:20 PM, John Cowan <cowan@x> wrote:
Helmut Eller scripsit:
Correct, but it does (as do R2RS, R3RS, and R4RS) use the phrase "is
> R5RS does not have exceptions and in particular did not have an error
This may be obvious to you, but the objection here is that the phrase "is an error" is confusing in R7RS-small because it also has an error procedure. This confusion did not exist in R5RS and previous standards.
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports