[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
On Sat 14 May 2011 07:08, John Cowan <cowan@x> writes:
>> A simple email to the maintainers of the dozen or two Scheme systems
>> that you normally test on, with a brief summary of the questions,
>> options, and draft outcomes might get thoughts, feedback, and perhaps
>> more buy-in from the implementors whose names I don't often see on
>> this or other Scheme '11 lists.
> Sounds like way too much work for yours truly, not to mention too much
> work to reply. I'll stick with people who want to be members, or who
> spontaneously send critiques to this list. I'm all in favor of both of
> those groups.
I'll consider your suggestion, but I still think that neglecting
implementors is the wrong thing, unless the goal is to get feedback only
once the standard is out.
Scheme-reports mailing list