[Scheme-reports] Are record field names bound by a record type def?

[Andre van Tonder <andre@x>]

According to the descroption on p. 20, the record type <name> is bound to a
representation of the record type.

But how about the field names?  Are they bound to anything by the record type 
definition.  If not, why do we have them?  What is their function?



_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports