[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Scheme-reports] Are record field names bound by a record type def?
- To: scheme-reports@x
- Subject: [Scheme-reports] Are record field names bound by a record type def?
- From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
- Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:27:22 -0400 (EDT)
According to the descroption on p. 20, the record type <name> is bound to a
representation of the record type.
But how about the field names? Are they bound to anything by the record type
definition. If not, why do we have them? What is their function?
Scheme-reports mailing list