[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Scheme-reports] 6.1 Equivalence predicates; 6.2 Numbers
- To: scheme-reports <scheme-reports@x>
- Subject: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Equivalence predicates; 6.2 Numbers
- From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 22:28:06 +0100
The paragraph and example of eqv? on procedures with local state are
superfluous: it doesn't matter if a procedure has local state or not, as
the report has explicitly un-specified eqv? on procedures. In this
sense, closures are not objects.
In 6.2.4, "A NaN always compares false to any number, including a NaN".
I thought the result of the discussion was that (eqv? +nan.0 +nan.0)
could be #t? I didn't really follow it anyway.
Scheme-reports mailing list