[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot
- To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
- Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot
- From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 01:58:16 -0400
- Cc: scheme-reports@x
- In-reply-to: <50594E7D.4060200@netris.org>
- References: <20120918074424.GF29149@mercury.ccil.org> <CALnw4LKioYkqOFkCO98Jj73rYSducSN-FXekig_0xm3nu_s9Vg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMPzYPypzwc-0Ozt4QoZPOee-zmnf6ZZiP3jgfBjUZZ_Hr5WQ@mail.gmail.com> <50594E7D.4060200@netris.org>
Mark H Weaver scripsit:
> On the contrary, (expt <anything> 0) should yield an exact 1
Are you sure? What about (expt +nan.0 0)?
--
Winter: MIT, John Cowan
Keio, INRIA, cowan@x
Issue lots of Drafts. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
So much more to understand!
Might simplicity return? (A "tanka", or extended haiku)
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports