Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Stefan Edwards scripsit:

> What about loading alternative implementation of a feature, such as
> falling back onto the reference implementation of a SRFI if the Scheme
> you're using doesn't provide one? I actually think this would ease
> writing libraries likes SLIB or Nausicaa that support multiple Scheme
> implementations and have to Spackle the gaps in features between them.

If possible that should be done using cond-expand in the module
language.

-- 
John Cowan  http://ccil.org/~cowan    cowan@x
There are books that are at once excellent and boring.  Those that at
once leap to the mind are Thoreau's Walden, Emerson's Essays, George
Eliot's Adam Bede, and Landor's Dialogues.  --Somerset Maugham

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports