[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
And now comes a question from a user who reads all your debates in
awe, but can't help thinking there's a lot of hair splitting involved.
"Why not just parameterize CASE or whatever pattern-matcher with an
Wouldn't this solve many problems we read here?
Would it create enough others problems to be disqualified?
I believe that
(case-with my-equality-predicate foo
(I hope my intervention is not too off topic…)
Français, English, 日本語, 한국어
Scheme-reports mailing list