[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers

To: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 00:37:09 -0700
Cc: scheme-reports@x
In-reply-to: <m34o4p25hd.fsf@unquote.localdomain>
References: <m3sjsl4nkd.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <BANLkTik84AVk5TbL=iAT-YYZpe05+QoO2w@mail.gmail.com> <m3fwol4hcv.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <BANLkTikYYcFWeCX3ZYHeKooO+N7pU7Ap2g@mail.gmail.com> <4DCA7950.1040500@snell-pym.org.uk> <20110511152502.GO28086@frohike.homeunix.org> <m339kl43yg.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <20110511162654.GP28086@frohike.homeunix.org> <m3y62c2xc2.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <BANLkTin+0O0t6o7ytFHcS+6smZpJ+vn2_Q@mail.gmail.com> <m3iptg2tg4.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <BANLkTikt-rUOQ=aRRnjihOy7-eNozYxGXg@mail.gmail.com> <19916.35537.820067.341759@winooski.ccs.neu.edu> <BANLkTi=g9-oy0M0kz8tc-rURVFPcwPCw8Q@mail.gmail.com> <4DCCED22.7040102@snell-pym.org.uk> <19916.63084.305286.250366@winooski.ccs.neu.edu> <BANLkTi=e-6Q+qYSwOcpyah3oRAXMtRbvBA@mail.gmail.com> <19924.5371.690867.61029@winooski.ccs.neu.edu> <BANLkTimAFOFRGq4BsNWT9GdzBtd2VKiEOA@mail.gmail.com> <m34o4p25hd.fsf@unquote.localdomain>

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Andy Wingo <wingo@x> wrote:
>
> If -- and who are we talking about here, is it a Chicken and Chibi
> thing, only?

No, I'm talking about all syntactic-closures based implementation.

-- 
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

References:
- [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>

Prev by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.3 symbols
Next by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 system interfaces
Previous by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
Next by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread