Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.10 Control Structures

[Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>]

On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Andy Wingo <wingo@x> wrote:

I know it's been up for a vote, but I think the WG went past
"consistency" to "foolish consistency" as regards string-map,
string-for-each, etc.  They seem singularly useless to me.

Agreed, but it's not a bug and we're not going to bother

re-voting on this.

 

I very much prefer the R6RS `map' to the SRFI-1 `map' as regards
multiple lists.

I disagree, and preferences aside SRFI-1 is far more widely

used than R6RS.

-- 

Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports