Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"

[Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>]

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Andre van Tonder <andre@x> wrote:
>
> Plus, traditional INCLUDE is nicely compositional.  An INCLUDEd file can in turn
> INCLUDE otehr files, ad nauseam.  On the other hand, WG1 module-level INCLUDE is
> not compositional.  This is fine but, again, somewhat ugly IMO.

Good point.

-- 
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports