Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Aaron W. Hsu scripsit:

> This just illustrates why choosing a syntax that is not backwards compatible 
> with R6RS, yet is a feature subset of it is a bad idea. This issue wouldn't 
> exist if we took the subset of features in R6RS that we currently use and use 
> the R6RS syntax. 

It's not a feature subset of it, because R6RS doesn't have `include`.

-- 
John Cowan    cowan@x    http://ccil.org/~cowan
Half the lies they tell about me are true.
        --Tallulah Bankhead, American actress

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports