[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers

To: scheme-reports@x
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 18:03:42 +0100
In-reply-to: <4DCC04AE.6050507@bothner.com>
References: <m3sjsl4nkd.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <BANLkTik84AVk5TbL=iAT-YYZpe05+QoO2w@mail.gmail.com> <m3fwol4hcv.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <BANLkTikYYcFWeCX3ZYHeKooO+N7pU7Ap2g@mail.gmail.com> <4DCA7950.1040500@snell-pym.org.uk> <20110511152502.GO28086@frohike.homeunix.org> <m339kl43yg.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <20110511162654.GP28086@frohike.homeunix.org> <m3y62c2xc2.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <BANLkTin+0O0t6o7ytFHcS+6smZpJ+vn2_Q@mail.gmail.com> <4DCBA801.5020502@snell-pym.org.uk> <m38vuc2oel.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <4DCC04AE.6050507@bothner.com>

On 05/12/11 17:02, Per Bothner wrote:

> This solution works pretty well in Kawa, which has good column-level
> diagnostics.  There are some problems: You can't give a precise
> position to a symbol in the cdr of a dotted pair - but that is a minor
> problem since Scheme doesn't allow dotted pairs in non-quoted expressions.

O RLY?

Is (lambda (a b c . rest) ...) not legal?

ABS

--
Alaric Snell-Pym
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Sztefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Per Bothner <per@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>

References:
- [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  - From: Per Bothner <per@x>

Prev by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
Next by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
Previous by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
Next by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread