Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Jussi Piitulainen scripsit:

> > Finally, in many places where a function is described the report
> > first says "it is an error if [...]" and only then describes what
> > the function does. Can we reverse this order?
> 
> Seconded. From what I remember in the draft that I last read - which
> is not the current draft - some of the "it is an error if" statements
> could be removed, since the type of the argument is already specified
> unobtrusively by the argument name in the entry head.

I've changed most of these around, though unfortunately not in time for
draft 6.  They will be in draft 7, however.

-- 
Real FORTRAN programmers can program FORTRAN    John Cowan
in any language.  --Ed Post                     cowan@x

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports