[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6

Jussi Piitulainen scripsit:

> > Finally, in many places where a function is described the report
> > first says "it is an error if [...]" and only then describes what
> > the function does. Can we reverse this order?
> Seconded. From what I remember in the draft that I last read - which
> is not the current draft - some of the "it is an error if" statements
> could be removed, since the type of the argument is already specified
> unobtrusively by the argument name in the entry head.

I've changed most of these around, though unfortunately not in time for
draft 6.  They will be in draft 7, however.

Real FORTRAN programmers can program FORTRAN    John Cowan
in any language.  --Ed Post                     cowan@x

Scheme-reports mailing list