Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant

[John David Stone <stone@x>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

        Musical Notation writes:

 > What sentence? You didn't include it in the reply. (Is it free to
distribute commercially?)

        At this point, I've concluded that Musical Notation is trolling
us.  I doubt that he or she has any actual interest in making Scheme
documents available through Wikimedia.

        The lesson for future RnRS authors:  Please use one of the standard
Creative Commons licenses, such as CC-BY.  Then, when people raise
questions like this in the future, just point them to the "lawyer-readable"
version of the relevant license.  No matter how many times they ask, send
the same link.  It's a lot less frustrating.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.9 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iEYEARECAAYFAlHunYsACgkQbBGsCPR0ElQuOACgke7yGZp4wVHzJpcFfOERkxOE
d/UAn3E4Vev31eQZ9FfKK6qtZ1txPQIl
=4jp/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports