Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution

[Eli Barzilay <eli@x>]

Two minutes ago, Arthur A. Gleckler wrote:
> > And given that the latter will be popular for a while longer, it's
> > especially surprising that it's different from inside a module.
> > Given that, it might make more sense to have it use the CWD when
> > used on the REPL, and throw a syntax error from inside a module.
> 
> I'm curious about what you mean by "... will be popular for a while
> longer...."  Is there some reason that REPLs are likely to fade from
> popularity?

I meant uses of `load'.

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports