Re: [Scheme-reports] "Language Changes"

[Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>]

On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Andy Wingo <wingo@x> wrote:

Regarding "Other language changes since R5RS", there are a couple points
regarding syntax definitions being allowed anywhere.  The second one
(internal syntax definitions) is probably redundant.

Removed.

 

I would change the "Incompatibilities with R6RS" to "Differences from
R6RS", and be a lot less snarky and defensive.

My preference is to remove the entire section about R6RS.

It's the job of the small language to be compatible of R5RS,

and the job of the large language to be compatible with R6RS,

so this entire section belongs in the WG2 report.

-- 

Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports