[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov scripsit:
> I am interested in this mostly from the user perspective. I don't
> know how many users are hanging around here, but I do hope this
> set is at least as large as the set of implementors...
I'm definitely a user, and not the heaviest user either. I have some
implementer perspective, because I've been an implementer, though not
John Cowan cowan@x http://ccil.org/~cowan
Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a computer
mouse transmitted across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality
is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even willful inaction,
as long as it is unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a contract.
--Specht v. Netscape
Scheme-reports mailing list