Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Peter Kourzanov scripsit:

> I am interested in this mostly from the user perspective. I don't
> know how many users are hanging around here, but I do hope this 
> set is at least as large as the set of implementors...

I'm definitely a user, and not the heaviest user either.  I have some
implementer perspective, because I've been an implementer, though not
of Scheme.

-- 
John Cowan  cowan@x   http://ccil.org/~cowan
Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a computer
mouse transmitted across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality
is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even willful inaction,
as long as it is unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a contract.
       --Specht v. Netscape

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports