Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> >     Similarly, during the expansion of a library {\cf foo}, if
> >     any syntax keywords imported from another library {\cf (bar)}
> >     are needed to expand the library, then the library {\cf (bar)}
> >     must be expanded and its syntax definitions evaluated before the
> >     expansion of {\cf (foo)}.
> 
> This looks fine to me.

Adopted and pushed (with the proper parens around the first instance of
"foo").

-- 
You let them out again, Old Man Willow!                 John Cowan
What you be a-thinking of?  You should not be waking!   cowan@x
Eat earth!  Dig deep!  Drink water!  Go to sleep!
Bombadil is talking.                                    http://ccil.org/~cowan

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports